May 12, 2025
0
58 Views
In modern work culture, availability is often conflated with commitment, and presence with performance. Leaders and professionals are conditioned to remain constantly "on," fearing that any form of absence — missed meetings, digital silence, or emotional distance — may signal disengagement or reduce their perceived value.
As a leadership coach, I have encountered this pattern frequently, especially among high-functioning professionals who equate their self-worth with their utility. In these cases, the fear of absence is not a surface-level concern but a deeply internalized belief tied to identity and belonging.
The fear of absence often stems from two intersecting cognitive schemas:
Self-Worth as Usefulness: The belief that one's value is contingent on their ability to contribute, help, or perform (McClure, 2020).
Hyper-Responsibility: A tendency to assume disproportionate responsibility for others’ well-being or stability (Beck, 1976).
From a psychological standpoint, this is aligned with core beliefs rooted in early attachment patterns and social validation dynamics. Social media and digital communication culture have intensified this through what S. Turkle (2011) calls "the pressure of perpetual contact."
In coaching sessions, this fear shows up in several forms:
Reluctance to take vacation or delegate
Over-involvement in team tasks
Guilt over setting communication boundaries
Emotional reactivity when not included in decisions
These patterns erode executive function, reduce strategic focus, and can lead to burnout (Maslach & Leiter, 2016).
The coaching process can be structured around helping clients:
Identify the Underlying Beliefs
"What do I fear will happen if I step away?"
"What part of me believes I must always be available to matter?"
Reframe Absence as Trust
Exploring how intentional absence can cultivate team autonomy and personal renewal
"Every time you step back, you teach someone else how to step forward."
Introduce Boundary Practices
Digital hygiene (e.g., off-hours policies)
Delegation as a leadership competency
Normalize Psychological Distance
Using mindfulness and somatic techniques to tolerate the discomfort of non-doing.
In one client case, a senior manager expressed guilt for not responding to Slack messages during her off-hours. We explored her automatic thoughts ("They’ll think I’m not committed"), reframed them ("Clear boundaries are part of sustainable leadership"), and co-created a new communication contract with her team. The result was increased clarity, respect, and reduced stress.
In another case, a CEO refused to take parental leave, fearing he would become irrelevant. Coaching focused on re-authoring his narrative: from “protector of the system” to “builder of a resilient culture.” After taking leave, he found his team more empowered, and his leadership more respected.
The fear of absence is not a flaw — it’s a learned adaptation in a culture that often mistakes visibility for value. But leadership grows when we recognize that absence is not abandonment; it can be an act of trust, strategy, and self-respect.
Coaching can support individuals in transforming this fear into insight, and insight into intentional choice — allowing them to reclaim space, restore balance, and lead from a place of wholeness.
References
Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. International Universities Press.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Burnout: A Multidimensional Perspective. Taylor & Francis.
McClure, B. A. (2020). The Function of Anxiety in High-Performing Individuals. Journal of Humanistic Psychology.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.
May 05, 2025
0
96 Views
Leadership is no longer defined solely by strategy, charisma, or innovation. It is increasingly measured by a deeper capacity: the ability to foster environments where people can show up fully — seen, heard, and valued.
Across industries, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB) are emerging not just as values, but as essential leadership practices. These concepts represent a shift away from transactional models of authority and toward relational, culturally intelligent leadership.
In this article, we explore the science, implications, and practice of DEIB in leadership coaching, drawing from psychological research, organizational studies, and lived coaching experience.
Diversity refers to the presence of difference in a group or organization. These differences may include race, gender, age, nationality, sexual orientation, neurodiversity, religious affiliation, socioeconomic status, and more. The value of diversity lies not in variety alone, but in the interplay of perspectives, which research consistently links to better decision-making and creativity (Cox, 1993).
True diversity begins when leaders become curious about perspectives unlike their own — and remain open to the discomfort it can bring.
Equity is often misunderstood as equality, but they are not the same. While equality gives everyone the same resources, equity acknowledges that different people have different needs. In organizations, equity demands a deep awareness of structural barriers and an active redistribution of access, opportunity, and support (Sensoy & DiAngelo, 2017).
This mindset requires leaders to adopt a systemic lens — to look not just at individuals, but at the systems that shape outcomes.
Inclusion is the practice of ensuring that every person in the room feels welcome to participate. This means more than representation — it means engaging people meaningfully in dialogue, decision-making, and leadership itself.
In coaching sessions, inclusion shows up in the questions leaders ask: Who hasn’t spoken yet? Whose input is missing from this decision?
Belonging is the emotional outcome of sustained inclusion. It is the experience of being accepted for one’s whole self — not just the parts that conform. Deloitte (2019) found that people who feel they belong are over six times more likely to be engaged at work.
Belonging is what turns a workplace into a community. It is the deepest expression of psychological safety.
The research is clear: organizations that lead with DEIB principles perform better, retain more talent, and build stronger cultures.
A McKinsey & Company report (2020) showed that companies with more diverse executive teams were more likely to achieve above-average profitability. But beyond data, DEIB builds the kind of trust, engagement, and loyalty that numbers alone can’t generate.
In coaching conversations, I’ve seen leaders shift their mindset from “How do I include more people?” to “What in our system is preventing people from participating fully?” That’s when real transformation begins!
Psychological Safety and Innovation
Amy Edmondson’s work on psychological safety (1999) shows that inclusive environments fuel learning, innovation, and accountability. When people feel safe to take interpersonal risks — asking questions, challenging norms, admitting mistakes — the entire organization becomes more adaptive.
DEIB directly supports this by ensuring that people are not punished for difference, but recognized for it. When inclusion and equity are practiced consistently, people are more willing to speak up and contribute their best thinking.
Despite its importance, DEIB implementation is often hindered by unconscious bias, fear of conflict, and a lack of systemic awareness.
1. Performative Inclusion: Surface-level gestures that lack follow-through, such as diversity statements with no change in behavior or policy.
2. Blind Spots in Leadership: Unexamined assumptions about "merit," "fit," or "professionalism" often exclude voices that don't mirror the dominant culture.
3. Absence of Metrics: Without data and accountability, DEIB efforts remain anecdotal and subjective.
Effective DEIB work requires both personal humility and organizational structure.
In my own coaching practice, DEIB often enters quietly, through the side door. A team is struggling with communication, but beneath the surface is a deeper tension: the same people always speak, and others consistently defer.
We pause and ask: Who feels they belong here? Who’s adapting constantly just to stay in the room?
One executive client began asking each team member not just “What do you need from me?” but “What does leadership look like to you?” The answers surprised him — and changed how he led.
To integrate DEIB meaningfully into leadership practice:
1. Listen before leading: Host listening sessions or 1:1 conversations to understand how people experience your culture.
2. Use equity audits: Evaluate compensation, promotion patterns, and access to mentorship by demographic breakdowns.
3. Personalize inclusion: Ask what inclusion looks like for each team member; it differs widely.
4. Model discomfort: Normalize learning aloud. DEIB work often requires unlearning, which can feel vulnerable.
DEIB is not a separate project from leadership — it is leadership. It challenges us to move from unconscious default to intentional design. From dominance to partnership. From fitting in to truly belonging.
Organizations that embrace DEIB are not just more ethical. They are more human, more resilient, and better prepared for the complexities of modern work.
As coaches, our task is to support this shift — one conversation at a time.
References
Ahmed, S. (2012). On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Duke University Press.
Catalyst. (2021). The Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Employee Engagement and Retention.
Cox, T. (1993). Cultural Diversity in Organizations: Theory, Research and Practice. Berrett-Koehler.
Deloitte. (2019). The Diversity and Inclusion Revolution: Eight Powerful Truths.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.
McKinsey & Company. (2020). Diversity Wins: How Inclusion Matters.
Sensoy, O., & DiAngelo, R. (2017). Is Everyone Really Equal? Teachers College Press.
Shore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., & Sanchez, D. (2011). Inclusive Workplaces: A Review and Model. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 311–326.
October 07, 2024
0
311 Views
When it comes to creating impactful conversations—whether in coaching, sales, or leadership—two elements play a central role: trust and influence. Think of trust as the foundation of a strong relationship, and influence as the tool that helps you guide meaningful action. The two go hand in hand, and when used together, they can truly transform the way we connect and influence others.
In this article, we will explore the concepts behind trust and influence, break down the insights from our upcoming "Creating Trust, Activating Influence" workshop, and show you how to leverage these principles in your work connections.
At the core of every successful interaction lies trust. Trust is what makes people feel comfortable enough to open up, share their thoughts, and take your advice seriously. Influence, on the other hand, is what enables you to guide them toward meaningful action based on that trust. These two elements form the foundation of relationships in business, sales,coaching and personal life.
While trust is about creating a safe environment, influence is the ability to inspire and motivate others to act. The key is to use these two forces together—when they work in harmony, you can transform ordinary interactions into impactful, meaningful conversations.
Our upcoming "Creating Trust, Activating Influence" workshop focuses on combining trust-building techniques with influence strategies that can be applied in any scenario—whether you're leading a team, guiding a client through a transformative decision, or navigating challenging conversations. Here's how the workshop breaks down these skills:
1. Mastering Persuasion Techniques
One of the most important aspects of influence is understanding the psychology behind it. In the workshop, you'll learn Cialdini’s Principles of Influence, a respected model for ethical persuasion. These principles—such as reciprocity, scarcity, and authority—provide you with a framework to influence others in a way that fosters mutual respect and collaboration.
Example:
Imagine you're leading a meeting where you need your team to adopt a new process. By using the principle of social proof, you can show that other departments are successfully using the same process, making your team more likely to follow suit.
2. Building Trust and Credibility
Trust doesn't happen overnight, but there are effective strategies you can use to build it quickly. The workshop introduces the Fogg Behavior Model, which helps you design trust-building interactions that align with the motivations of those you’re engaging with. You'll learn how to communicate in a way that builds credibility and creates a genuine connection.
Example:
If you're presenting a new idea to a client, you might align your proposal with their core values, demonstrating that you understand their priorities. This approach builds credibility and trust, making them more likely to trust your guidance.
3. Communicating Effectively Across Different Styles
A crucial element of influence is understanding the different ways people communicate. In this session, you'll explore Transactional Analysis (TA), a model that helps you recognize and respond to different ego states—Parent, Adult, and Child. This understanding allows you to adapt your communication style based on the emotional and intellectual needs of your audience, making your message more impactful.
Example:
In a team discussion, you might recognize that a colleague is speaking from their "Parent" ego state, offering rules and guidelines. By responding from your "Adult" state, with logic and calm reasoning, you can balance the conversation and keep it productive.
4. Handling Objections with Confidence
One of the biggest challenges in guiding decisions is handling objections. Instead of seeing objections as roadblocks, the workshop shows you how to view them as opportunities to build trust and further influence. Using the Challenger Sales Model, you'll learn how to reframe objections and use them to strengthen your position without pressuring or manipulating the other person.
Example:
If a client pushes back on your proposal, you can use their objection to ask more questions, showing that you genuinely want to address their concerns. This approach not only builds trust but also opens the door for collaboration and better outcomes.
These concepts apply to anyone who wants to improve their communication and relationship-building skills. Whether you're a coach working to guide clients through growth, a sales professional aiming to close deals, or a leader managing a team, building trust and influence will empower you to:
So, if you’re ready to take the next step in mastering these skills, don’t miss the opportunity to join us for this transformative workshop.
For more details, visit 👉 https://arcadiacoachinglab.com/academia.
Bibliography:
Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Harper Business.
Covey, S. R. (2004). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. Free Press.
Berne, E. (1964). Games People Play: The Psychology of Human Relationships. Grove Press.
Dixon, M., & Adamson, B. (2011). The Challenger Sale: Taking Control of the Customer Conversation. Penguin.
The Fear of Absence: Coaching Through the Pressure to Always Be Present
Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB)
"Half Human, Half Machine: The New Art of Leadership"
Happiness is a Work in Progress!
Think Like a Philosopher, Act Like a Leader!
The Power of the Drexler-Sibbet Team Performance Model for Enhanced Team Dynamics
Introduction to the FEEL Model: An Approach in Emotional Intelligence and Coaching Practices
Commitment in Command! The Secret Psychology Behind Effective Leadership